UFPLS vs Drawdown

There are a number of different ways to take money out of your pension fund. But depending on the route chosen, the age of the individual, the tax implications and impact on future pension savings will be different.

In this article we are looking at taking benefits in phases, to help with this we’ll show the different impacts using a case study.

Tax free cash only

One way of taking money out of your pension pot a bit at a time is to take 25% tax-free cash at the start and move the remaining 75% into an income drawdown pot. With flexi-access drawdown the money purchase annual allowance (MPAA) isn’t triggered when you take the initial 25% tax-free cash, it’s only triggered once you take your first income withdrawal, from the 75%. 

It’s worth remembering that not all pension plans can support income drawdown. This is especially the case with older plans.  If that is the case the benefits should be transferred to a plan that can before crystallising benefits. 

Partial benefits

Another option is to take your tax-free cash gradually. Every time you take money from your pension pot, 25% of it is tax-free and tax is payable, at your marginal rate, on the other 75% of each lump sum. The MPAA is triggered by the first payment of income benefits. 

Case study one

  • Working
  • Higher rate taxpayer

In this example Nabeel, aged 55, lives in England and is a higher rate taxpayer.  He requires £20,000 to build a 'granny' flat onto his house as he can't afford to move to a bigger house due to the cost, in particular stamp duty. 

He is still working and funding his pension and is at the age where due to his work experience his earning potential is fairly high. In turn his pensions contributions are significant and will also increase.  He is currently paying £4,800 into his works money purchase pension plan, his employer matches this amount, so a total of £9,600 is being paid in.  He also has another pension pot of £380,000 that is not being paid into.

Partial/phased drawdown

He can transfer the £380,000 fund into a plan that offers drawdown and crystallise £80,000 giving him £20,000 (25%) tax free.  He doesn't need an income just now as he has enough to live on from his salary.  As no income is taken this does not trigger the MPAA allowing him to contribute as normal into his workplace pension and not be restricted to £4,000.  No income tax is payable as he does not need an income from the pension savings at the moment. The house value will increase due to the extension and increases his estate for IHT purposes, but the £360,000 left over is still in the pensions ‘tax wrapper’ keeping it outside his estate for IHT.

  • Income withdrawals from a flexi access drawdown pension trigger the MPAA.
  • All the payments made in excess of the tax-free cash are taxable as the member’s pension income via PAYE.
  • Unused funds remain invested and therefore subject to investment risk.
  • Possibility that entire fund could be depleted and leave the client with insufficient funds to live on in retirement.

Uncrystallised fund pension lump sum (UFPLS)

He can take a partial UFPLS from the plan. This will trigger the money purchase annual allowance (MPAA), which would restrict future pension contributions to £4,000 or the MPAA charge would apply.  Because part of the payment will be taxable income Nabeel will have to crystallise more that the £20,000.

In this case it makes sense for Nabeel to use phased drawdown rather than an UFPLS

Case study two

  • Retired
  • Non-tax payer

Let's look at Nabeel again in the same scenario but aged 65 and retiring.

In this example Nabeel is now aged 65, lives in England and is currently a higher rate taxpayer, but will be a basic rate or non-taxpayer in the next tax year.  He requires £20,000 to build an extension on his house so he has room for his new hobby in retirement. 

He stops working at the end of the year in December and takes an UFPLS in April of the tax year after he stopped working. He will then have no earnings that will use up his personal allowance.  He supplements his income by moving his workplace pension into drawdown, and will phase this so that he can utilise his personal allowance each year.

An UFPLS is an option as he has no intention paying into a pension so the MPAA restriction of on the level of contributions does not affect him. 

 PCLS via drawdown
(Nil income higher rate taxpayer)
UFPLS (Non tax payer)
Amount crystallised   £80,000  £20,589 before tax
Tax-free amount £20,000  £5,147
Amount added to taxable income £0  £15,441
Crystallised fund £60,000  £0
Income after tax  £0  £14,8531
Total received £20,000 £20,000 (£5,147 + £14,853)
Annual allowance for future contributions £40,000 £4,000

1 Emergency tax codes will normally apply resulting in an initial overpayment of tax.  Nabeel’s full personal allowance would be used when his UFPLS was paid, meaning only £2941 would be liable to basic rate income tax

 

Note

The information provided is based on our current understanding of the relevant legislation and regulations and may be subject to alteration as a result of changes in legislation or practice. Also it may not reflect the options available under a specific product which may not be as wide as legislations and regulations allow.

All references to taxation are based on our understanding of current taxation law and practice and may be affected by future changes in legislation and the individual circumstances of the investor.

Share by email:

Share by email:

This website is intended for financial advisers only and shouldn't be relied upon by any other person. If you are not an adviser please visit royallondon.com.

The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. The firm is on the Financial Services Register, registration number 117672. It provides life assurance and pensions. Registered in England and Wales number 99064. Registered office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0RL.