Under a capped income drawdown contract, a tax-free cash sum of up to 25% of the fund is paid to the member. The remainder of the pension pot can then be used to provide the member with income.
The maximum amount of income that can be taken during a 'pension year' is 150% of the Government Actuary's Department (or GAD as it's affectionately known) relevant annuity with no guarantee.
The member can take any level of income they like from their fund up to this maximum limit.
The maximum amount of income allowed applies for a 12 month period immediately after first taking income and any subsequent 12 month period. These 12 month periods are known as 'pension years'.
To make sure that the income drawdown fund continues to provide an income and isn't used up too quickly, the maximum income that can be taken is reviewed. For members under age 75 this is done on the following basis:
Let's look at each of the above now in turn.
As a minimum, a review now has to take place at least every three years. Each three year period is known as the 'reference period'. The point at which a review is carried out is called the 'reference date'.
The first reference date is on the first day of the fourth pension year following the designation of income drawdown, then again on the first day of the seventh year and so on. This continues until one of the following events occur:
At the review date the new maximum income is calculated in exactly the same way as the initial maximum with reference to the GAD tables, value of the income drawdown fund and member's age. The new limit for the next three years is then set at 150% of the revised amount.
The maximum amount of income normally changes following a review. By how much depends on the investment performance of the fund, the amount of income taken during the reference period and the GAD interest rate at the time of review. If the fund has benefited from strong investment growth and a low income has been taken, the maximum level of income will undoubtedly rise. Conversely, if fund performance has been poor and maximum income has been taken, the new limit is likely to be lower than before. Also, the higher the GAD interest rate the higher the relevant annuity on which the GAD limit is based.
In addition to the basic requirement of a review taking place every three years, certain events trigger an additional review. These reviews don't alter the existing pension year or reference period structure, or indeed the timing of the next three yearly review:
|When a lifetime annuity or scheme pension is purchased by part of the fund||
|The fund is reduced following a pension sharing event||
|Where additional fund designation occurs||
|Where there is full annuitisation and later designation of uncrystallised funds occurs under the arrangement||
Of course, members don't have to wait three years or for one of the above events to occur. They can request additional reviews but the final decision as to whether to grant one or not lies with the scheme administrator. The new limits apply from the start of the next pension year and can't start immediately.
Let's take a typical example by looking at a scheme's first three pension years. These form the first reference period:
As the member's pension fund has performed very well since the maximum amount was first calculated on 1 October 2013, they'd now like to draw a higher income. Consequently, if on or before 30 September 2015 the member makes a request for a new reference date of 1 October 2015 and the scheme administrator agrees, the new reference period for the arrangement will look like this:
Reaching age 75 is a benefit crystallisation event (BCE) and so the drawdown fund will be tested against the lifetime allowance. Obviously, going into drawdown in the first place was also a BCE so, to avoid a 'double counting' against the lifetime allowance, the amount originally crystallised when the member went into drawdown is deducted. Only the balance (if any) therefore counts as an additional BCE amount.
The review dates also change - the maximum drawdown pension will now need to be recalculated at the start of every pension year. The switch over to yearly reviews will happen at the end of the pension year following the member's 75th birthday.
Yes it is. However, the existing pre April 2015 rules still apply where the capped drawdown plan can only be transferred to an empty arrangement containing no other sums or assets.
There is more information in HMRC's Registered Pension Scheme Manual - Transfers in drawdown.
In most situations the maximum income that can be taken from a drawdown plan will change at each review, depending on investment performance,the amount of income taken and the prevailing GAD interest rate. Members also need to be aware that certain actions e.g. designating additional funds, will trigger a review.
Published 26 February 2008
The information provided is based on our current understanding of the relevant legislation and regulations and may be subject to alteration as a result of changes in legislation or practice.
Any research and analysis has been provided by us for our own purposes and the results of it are being made available only incidentally.