Lifetime ISAs – International Evidence

28 June 2016
Since the announcement in March, the Lifetime ISA (LISA) has attracted controversy. Heralded as a saviour for the self-employed and the young wanting to get on the housing ladder, the new LISA risks adding confusion for savers trying to fully understand the benefits of new workplace pension savings through auto-enrolment.

To better understand how the LISA could potentially work with the current UK pensions system, Royal London sponsored independent research by the Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) to examine the international evidence of how early access savings schemes worked in other countries.

The PPI research examined evidence from five countries, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore and compared  similar propositions in those countries to the  proposed  LISA available in the UK from April 2017.

Royal London fed into the research, through a panel debate which included representatives from the Treasury, DWP, ABI and Personal Finance Society, among others, which helped inform the final research Briefing Note,'Lifetime ISAs – international evidence'.

The research findings

The findings raised a number of key issues about the impact of the LISA on long term savings in the UK which will need to be addressed before they are launched.

  • Firstly, in all of the countries surveyed, early access schemes were integrated into the wider pensions system. Without the need to select a separate product for early access saving, this means that savers don’t miss out on valuable employer contributions, the loss of which PPI calculated could reduce LISA savers pot sizes by up to a third at retirement. This integration extends to being able to secure an income in retirement, the mechanics of which for prospective LISA savers is still not clear.
  • Early access has affected the investment attitudes of long term international savers. Evidence from the US and New Zealand shows that savers are more conservative, investing in lower-risk, lower-return assets that are highly liquid. Given that over 80% of ISAs, are currently held in cash, a trend particularly pronounced among young savers, it is likely  that LISA savers will follow a similarly risk averse strategy. This is potentially not the best investment strategy for long-term pension saving.
  • One of the stark differences between a LISA and international early access long term savings regimes is the treatment of first home purchase. Just 1.8% of the 2.5 million New Zealanders using the ‘KiwiSaver’ scheme had withdrawn money for a first home. In Singapore, funds withdrawn to purchase a home must be repaid with interest, when the property is sold to mitigate loss of funds.
  • There are also tax restrictions in other countries to encourage phased withdrawals. There is no proposal yet on whether the funds accessed from LISA will require repayment or restrictions on withdrawals to ensure savings are not depleted too early.
  • One of the arguments in favour of LISAs is that they will allow savers to withdraw their money free of any tax charges, if they meet the terms outlined. In Australia, where withdrawals are currently tax free on Superannuation policies, the most recent Australian budget proposed a retrospective tax of 15% on withdrawals of above AS$1.6 million. This is a high amount but PPI flag that this is a way for Government’s to limit the tax free savings available and increase revenue. This questions whether LISA will always be TEE in the long term.
  • LISA are not framed as workplace pensions and so will not be regulated by The Pensions Regulator. This means that LISA savers are unlikely to benefit from a charge cap, which is currently set at 0.75% or the provision of free guidance. This could have a significant impact for long-term savings. PPI estimated that if Lifetime ISA funds were charged at 1-1.5%, they could erode the value of a savings pot by 13% by retirement.
  • In addition, in other countries early access is monitored by a combination of providers, employers and government. If LISA providers are responsible for managing early access this will increase the administrative burden resulting in higher charges for LISA savers.

The Treasury is expected to feedback on the consultation findings around the time of the EU Referendum and details available on the actual specifications for LISA in late July/ August. Watch this space!

And just in case you wondered, LISA is pronounced l-eye-sa, rather than Lee –sa, we checked with the Treasury!

Further information

The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) is an educational research charity, which provides non-political, independent comment and analysis on policy on pensions and retirement income provision in the UK.

Its aim is to improve the information and understanding about pensions policy and retirement income provision through research and analysis, discussion and publication.

More information on the PPI is available on their website:  

The Pensions Policy Institute’s previous briefing note on the LISA, 'Lifetime ISAs: pension complement or rival'.

About the author

Fiona Tait

Pension Specialist

Fiona joined the life and pensions industry in 1989. She is a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society, an Associate of the Chartered Insurance Institute and is currently Vice-President of The Insurance Society of Edinburgh. Fiona specialises in the areas of at retirement planning and pensions and divorce.

Last updated: 08 Jul 2016

This website is intended for financial advisers only and shouldn't be relied upon by any other person. If you are not an adviser please visit

The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England and Wales number 99064. Registered office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0RL.