Provider and adviser options around insistent clients

29 June 2015
Or how to respond to the cry, "I want my money!"
FCA guidance on insistent clients

Download the FCA factsheet for advisers on Pension reforms and insistent clients.

Obviously the availability of a cash lump sum to spend as they like is extremely attractive to the majority of pension clients. Some of them need it to pay off debt or finance specific purchases, and some just want it "because it's their money".

Either way, anything that stops clients accessing their money is seen as an unnecessary barrier and someone must be blamed.

Top of the list for taking the flack are pension providers, closely followed by "expensive" advisers. This article looks at the true barriers and the reasons behind them.

Plus we take a look at the new FCA guidance for advisers too.

Providers

Access to retirement options

There are indeed some providers who have chosen not to offer the new options to take cash or flexible income, and at least one has confirmed it would like to but hasn't been able to do it in time.

However most providers such as Royal London who are active in the pension market have been able to make the options available within the relatively short timescale allowed, albeit not necessarily from every contract .

The truth is that providers are not required to offer these freedoms at all. The legislation is permissive, not prescriptive. So if the government feels they are "dragging their heels" over it then they will need to take a different stance.

Requirement for advice

There are also accusations that providers are using advisers as an excuse not to pay out money.

The difficulty here is that there is legislation in place but it lacks clarity and has - up until now - been interpreted differently by different providers.

What is clear is that any client with over £30K in a pension plan which includes safeguarded benefits MUST seek advice before they take their money out of the plan. This has already led to a number of policyholders seeking advisers who will simply "rubber stamp" their decision to take their money.

What is less clear is what happens when the fund is smaller than £30K. Royal London has always strongly recommended taking advice when accessing pension benefits, and we ensure that every client is provided with the details of the adviser we have on record for them.

We have, however, also taken the view that it is the client's money after all. So if they insist on withdrawing their money without, or in contradiction of advice, we will pay out. Some other providers have taken a different position and have insisted on advice for all clients. This is a provider-specific decision.

Then we have the situation when the client has taken advice but the adviser's recommendation is not to take their money...

Advisers

Insistent clients

Until now the FCA has refused to recognise the concept of an "insistent client". However the rising numbers of consumers wanting to access their pension, together with pressure from the industry, has led to the publication of FCA factsheet 035.

This factsheet outlines the steps an adviser should take if their client insists on going against their advice.

  1. The adviser should have actually given advice. It is by no means a given that a transfer/encashment is unsuitable in all cases.
  2. If the client wants to follow another course of action it must be made very clear that that this is against your advice.
  3. Where the client decides to continue the adviser must make the risks of their chosen course of action clear.

As well as these pointers, the factsheet contains examples of good and bad practice that they have already seen and commented on. This is a must-read for advisers.

Standard disclaimer

Despite this welcome guidance from the regulator, many advisers remain concerned that not everyone will view it consistently. In particular it would be welcome if PI Insurers and the Financial Ombudsman Service would provide clarity around how they intend to deal with any future claims.

Advisers will want to be assured that their clients take full responsibility for their actions where it is contrary to their professional recommendation, even if the adviser then assists the clients to transact.

One thing that would help is an industry-standard disclaimer which clients could sign stating something similar to this:

  1. I confirm that I have received advice from [name of adviser]. The recommendation I was given was...
  2. I confirm I have had the possible consequences of my actions explained to me and I accept full liability should any of these consequences occur.
  3. I confirm that it is my decision to [transfer/encash my pension] and I take full responsibility for any future outcome.

But maybe that's just too sensible.

In summary

  • Most current pension providers now offer UFPLS and Flexi-Access Drawdown although there is no statutory requirement for them to do so.
  • There is a statutory requirement that clients with pensions funds >£30k which include safeguarded benefits MUST take financial advice.
  • The FCA has issued guidance for advisers facing clients who are insistent on transferring or withdrawing their money against their recommendation of their adviser.

Further reading

Read the FCA Factsheet 035: Pension reforms and insistent clients in full. This factsheet provides a helpful reminder of the FCA position on insistent clients, given the pension reforms introduced in April 2015.

About the author

Fiona Tait

Pension Specialist

Fiona joined the life and pensions industry in 1989. She is a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society, an Associate of the Chartered Insurance Institute and is currently Vice-President of The Insurance Society of Edinburgh. Fiona specialises in the areas of at retirement planning and pensions and divorce.

Last updated: 29 Jul 2016

This website is intended for financial advisers only and shouldn't be relied upon by any other person. If you are not an adviser please visit royallondon.com.

The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England and Wales number 99064. Registered office: 55 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0RL.